Google

Here are a number of examples of using atlc. Each example can be found in the examples directory.
Cross section Properties E-field Ex field Ey-field Voltage Energy Permittivity
multiple dielectric multi-dielectric.bmp:
C= 93.7871 pF/m
L= 279.3847 nH/m
Zo= 54.5795 Ohms		 multiple dielectric E-field multiple dielectric Ex-field multiple dielectric Ey-field multiple dielectric V-field multiple dielectric U-field multiple dielectric Er-field
ushaped-line ushape.bmp:
C= 76.4283
L= 145.5809 nH/m
Zo= 43.6441 Ohms		 ushaped-line-E ushaped-line-Ex ushaped-line-Ey ushaped-line-voltage ushaped-line-energy ushaped-line-permittivity
Coax coax2.bmp:
C= 47.6374 pF/m
L= 233.5667 nH/m
Zo= 70.0215 Ohms		 Coax-E-field Coax-Ex field Coax-Ey-field Coax-Voltage Coax-Energy Coax-Energy
very odd transmission line very-odd.bmp:
C=59.1756 pF/m
L= 188.0251 nH/m
Zo= 56.3685 Ohms		 E-field Ex field Ey field Voltage Energy Energy
Twin wire twin-wire.bmp:
C= 63.2867 pF/m
L= 175.8111 nH/m
Zo= 52.7068 Ohms		 E-field Ex field Ey field Voltage Enrrgy Permittivity

The full details of exactly what the files mean is given here. In the case of the twin-wire, and the muti-dielectric, the electric field extends to infinity, as there is no surrounding conductor like in the case of the coax, u-shaped conductor of the very odd shape. By putting the twin-wire or multi-dielectric onto a finite grid, which does not extend to infintiy, we have introduced an error. Hopefully this error is very small, but in this case it is not, as we can see from the plots of electric field, that the E-field has not fallen to a negligible amount at the edges. In cases like this, the same bitmap should be drawn on a larger grid, as in the next example.
twin wire twin-wire twin-wire2.bmp:With the bitmap drawn on a larger (256x256) image like this, the error introduced by truncating the fields to zero at the edges of the image are smaller. For this simulation, atlc reports
C= 57.1575 pF/m
L= 194.6639 nH/m
Zo= 58.3588 Ohms
The results are clearly very different from what the first simulation showed.
The results with the twin-wire show the problem with simulations in which the fields theoretically stretch to infinity. The calculations were then repeated on a 512x512 and 1024x1024 grid. The results for all the calculations are shown below as well as the times taken on a dual processor Sun Ultra 60 (2 x 300 MHz CPUs).
128x128 (twin-wire.bmp) Zo= 52.7068 Ohms run time = 1 s.
256x256 (twin-wire2.bmp) Zo= 58.3588 Ohms run time = 8 s
512x512 (twin-wire3.bmp) Zo= 60.7080 Ohms run time = 82 s.
1024x1024 (twin-wire4.bmp) Zo= 61.9047 Ohms run time = 834 s.
2048x2048 (twin-wire5.bmp) Zo= 62.3786 Ohms run time = 4300 s.
Inspecting the results one can see that as the grid size is increased, so the results converge. and for all practical results, the last result should be sufficiently accurate. Unfortunately it was obtained at the expense of a lot of CPU time.

The problem with the fields being truncated does not exist with fully enclosed transmission lines. As is shown in the accuracy section, the results are very acurate on other such lines in a very short time.

atlc is written and supported by Dr. David Kirkby (G8WRB) It it issued under the GNU General Public License

Return to the atlc homepage